Kant's non-consequentialist approach to ethics, 2038 words | 9 pages reflective essay kant 's non-consequenlialist approach to ethics the name of comm101 is principle of responsible commerce before i enrolled the comm101, i have no idea about principle of responsible commerce. Kantian ethics is decidedly non-consequentialist in consequentalist ethics, the morality or immorality of an action is determined by the outcome of that action the question to be asked is, was the result of the action ethically valid.
Non-consequentialist theories here we look at kant’s theory kant’s deontology one way to approach kant’s theory is to contrast it with utilitarianism for the latter, the right depends on something else, the good: what's right is to maximize the good the right is a means to bring about the good kant’s ethics is case.
Is kantian ethics a consequentialist or non-consequentialist moral theory why non-consequentialist i feel that ‘pigeonholing’ kant, or anyone else for that matter, into this or that ‘binary’ definition is not particularly helpful. The two-level approach to consequentialism is most often associated in which the ultimate aim is to produce beauty however, one might fix on non-psychological goods as the relevant effect consequentialism can also be contrasted with aretaic moral theories such as virtue ethics whereas consequentialist theories posit that consequences. This approach to ethics is based upon the aphorism, ‘ends justify the means’ the theory states that whether an act is right or wrong depends upon consequences of the action if the consequence is good then the act is good, and vice versa, and more good the consequence is better is the act.
Kant's version of duty-based ethics was based on something that he called 'the categorical imperative' which he intended to be the basis of all other rules (a 'categorical imperative' is a rule. Kantians and consequentialists alike have presumed that kantian ethics is incompatible with all forms of consequentialism, and that it instead justifies a system of agent‐centered restrictions, or deontological constraints, on the maximization of the good unlike all forms of utilitarian theories, kant's ethical theory is supposed to justify basic human rights, respect for which constrains.
Secondly, i will brief what is kant's non-consequentialist theory kant's theory is an important example of a purely non-consequentialist approach to ethics kant held that only when we act from duty does our action have moral worth( shaw, barry, sansbury, 2009, p92. Kant’s moral theory is perhaps the most influential of all nonconsequentialist approaches in his view, right actions have moral value only if they are done with a good will—for duty’s sake alone. Under this form of ethics you can't justify an action by showing that it produced good consequences, which is why it's sometimes called 'non-consequentialist' the word 'deontological' comes from.
Kant’s ethics so far in our this line of thought was developed by the author of one of the great non-consequentialist moral systems, immanuel kant about the consequentialist what should we say kant himself was well aware of this consequence of his theory, and he believed it to be correct thinking that one. German philosopher immanuel kant (1724-1804) was an opponent of consequentialism, and propagated a deontological moral theory of ethics, which is popularly known as kantianism theory of ethics basic proposition of kantianism is that action of people should not depend upon consequences, rather should be dictated by categorical imperatives that. In ethics, kant seeks a rational derivation of our moral duty kant seeks an a priori, non-consequentialist morality: we know what is right and wrong before we encounter a situation kant–awoken from his dogmatic slumber by reading hume.